INEC Chair Risks Jail Over Non-Compliance With Electoral Offences Order

2 hours ago 5

Shell

LAGOS – The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), a non-profit organ­isation, has filed a contempt lawsuit against Prof. Mah­mood Yakubu, Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for failing to investigate the al­legations of electoral offenc­es committed during the 2023 general elections, identify suspected perpetrators and their sponsors, and ensure their effective prosecution as ordered by the court.

The order issued by Justice Obiora Atuegwu Egwuatu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on July 18, 2024, man­dates INEC to investigate alleged electoral miscon­duct, including bribery and vote-buying involving state governors, their deputies, and other political figures.

The court also instructed INEC to appoint an indepen­dent counsel to pursue prose­cutions where warranted.

The court’s warning noted that Prof. Yakubu may face imprisonment for contempt should he fail to adhere to this order, stating, “Unless you obey the orders contained in the judgment, you will be guilty of contempt of court and liable to be committed to prison.”

In a statement signed by SERAP’s Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare, the organisation said, “It’s un­acceptable to take the court, which is the guardian of jus­tice in this country, for a ride. A democratic state based on the rule of law cannot exist or function, if INEC and its chair routinely ignore and/or fail to abide by court orders.

“Despite the service of the certified true copy of the judg­ment on INEC and Professor Yakubu, they have failed and/ or refused to obey it.

“The recurring cases of electoral bribery and vio­lence make a mockery of Ni­geria’s electoral process and participatory democracy. The latest allegations of electoral offences in Edo State show that INEC has learnt little or nothing from the well-docu­mented problems during the 2023 general elections.

“Ahead of the forthcom­ing governorship election in Ondo, INEC must turn the page on persistent electoral offences, end the impunity of perpetrators, and ensure citizens’ right to vote and po­litical participation.”

Justice Egwuatu’s judg­ment, reads in part: “The sub­stance of SERAP’s grouse is the violence associated with elections in Nigeria which tends to prevent citizens from exercising their fran­chise during elections, thus preventing credible election and in the long run credible leaders.

“There is no gainsaying the fact that electoral violence and the associated crimes committed during elections in Nigeria is a great bane to the development of this coun­try both democratically and economically.

“Being citizens of this great country, SERAP and its members have the legal interest whose enjoyment or enforcement directly or substantially depends on the performance of public duty by INEC.

“In requesting the per­formance of the public duty imposed on the electoral body, SERAP has demonstrated a great zeal of patriotism.

“There is no doubt that the Electoral Act 2022 created some electoral offences. Sec­tions 123, 124, 125, 126 127, 128 and 129 are some of the provi­sions of the Electoral Act that created some specific elector­al offences.

“Trial of offences created by the Electoral Act are done in a Magistrate Court or a High Court of a state in which the offence is committed, or the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. See Section 145(1) of the Electoral Act.

“By section 145(2) of the same Act, prosecution for the offences shall be undertak­en by legal officers of INEC or any legal practitioner appointed by INEC. Clearly therefore, the law imposes on INEC the performance of a public duty.

“Section 24(d) and (e) of the Nigerian constitution 1999 [as amended] recognises the rights of citizens to take steps towards advancing the community where he resides.

“The section provides that ‘it shall be the duty of every citizen to-(d) make positive and useful contribution to the advancement of progress and well-being of the community where he resides; (e) render assistance to appropriate and lawful agencies in the mainte­nance of law and order.”

Justice Egwuatu granted the following orders of man­damus against INEC (the judgment debtor): “An order of mandamus is hereby made di­recting and compelling INEC to seek the appointment of inde­pendent counsel to investigate allegations of electoral offences including bribery, vote-buying, conspiracy, and undue influ­ence against state governors and their deputies during the 2023 general elections.

“An order of mandamus is hereby made directing and compelling INEC to promptly, thoroughly and effectively in­vestigate reports of electoral violence and other electoral offences committed during the 2023 general elections, identify suspected perpetra­tors and their sponsors, and ensure their effective prose­cution.

“An order is mandamus is hereby made directing and compelling INEC to swiftly, prosecute all arrest­ed electoral offenders in the just concluded 2023 general election in the custody of the Nigeria Police Force, the Eco­nomic and Financial Crimes Commission, Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission and other law enforcement agencies.”

It would be recalled that SERAP had on July 20, 2024, requested Prof. Yakubu to “use his good offices and leadership position to imme­diately enforce the judgment ordering INEC to pursue cases of electoral offences in­cluding bribery against state governors and their deputies during the chaotic 2023 gener­al elections.”

SERAP brought the con­tempt lawsuit against INEC and Prof. Yakubu pursuant to Section 72 of the Sheriff and Civil Process Act and Order IX, Rule 13 of the Judgment (Enforcement) Rules of Court.

No date has, however, been fixed for the hearing of the contempt suit.

Source

News Videos