6 hours ago
4
The Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL) has filed a preliminary objection against the lawsuit initiated by Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE, which seeks exclusive rights to supply petroleum products in Nigeria, claiming that Dangote sued a non-existing entity.
In its filing through lead counsel Kehinde Ogunwumiju, SAN, the NNPCL argued that the legal action is incompetent, stating that Dangote Refinery’s attempt to invalidate its importation license is baseless.
According to its objection, the court processes showed that NNPC, an entity that is currently non-existent, was listed as a defendant in the matter.
“This 2nd defendant in this suit as consistently seen on the face of the plaintiff’s originating summons, the affidavit in support and the written address, is Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited, NNPC.
“A simple search on the CAC website shows that there is no entity called Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited, NNPC,” NNPCL added.
It argued that the NNPCL which filed the objection and the NNPC, are not the same, contending that the entity that was listed as a defendant in the matter, is a non-juristic person.
NNPCL also maintained that the suit was premature, even as it challenged the jurisdiction of the court to entertain it.
In the alternative, the NNPCL urged the court to strike out its name from the suit, insisting that the plaintiff was bereft of the locus standi (legal right) to seek such relief against it.
“The plaintiff’s suit is premature. The plaintiff’s suit discloses no cause of action. The 2nd defendant is not a competent party. The plaintiff’s suit is incompetent. This honourable court lacks the jurisdiction to hear this suit,” the NNPCL argued.
Meanwhile, the suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024, names the Nigeria Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), NNPCL, and several major oil marketers, including AYM Shafa Limited, A. A. Rano Limited, and Matrix Petroleum Services Limited, as defendants.
Cited as defendants in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024, were; the Nigeria Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), the NNPC and some major oil marketers that included AYM Shafa Limited, A. A. Rano Limited and Matrix Petroleum Services Limited.
According to the plaintiff, the NMDPRA acted in breach of Sections 317(8) and (9) of the Petroleum Industry Act, PIA, by issuing licenses for the importation of petroleum products to the defendants.
It told the court that the licences were issued to the defendants, “despite the production of AGO and Jet-A1 that exceeds the current daily consumption of petroleum products in Nigeria by the Dangote Refinery.”
ALSO READ: NNPCL, Dangote Refinery sign 10-year deal to boost local gas production
The plaintiff, therefore, prayed the court to award N100billion in damages against the NMDPRA for allegedly continuing to issue import licenses to NNPCL and the other defendants for the import of petroleum products such as Automotive Gas Oil (AGO) and Jet Fuel (aviation turbine fuel) into Nigeria.
Specifically, Dangote Refinery, among other things, applied for an order of injunction, restraining the 1st defendant (NMDPRA) from further issuing and/or renewing import licenses to the 2nd to 7th defendants or other companies for the purpose of importing petroleum products.
It further sought an order of the court directing the 1st defendant to seal off all tank farms, storage facilities, warehouses, and stations used by the defendants for the storage of all refined petroleum products imported into Nigeria.
“An order of mandatory injunction directing the 1st defendant to withdraw immediately all import licenses issued to the 2nd-7th defendants and other companies other than the plaintiff and other local refineries for the purpose of importing refined petroleum products into Nigeria.
“An order of injunction restraining the 1st defendant from imposing and demanding a 0.5% levy meant for off-takers of petroleum products directly and an additional 0.5% wholesale levy in favour of MDGIF or any other levy or sum against the plaintiff.”
READ MORE FROM: NIGERIAN TRIBUNE
